Article
Details
Citation
Morris J & Nicholls J (2025) The complexity of stigma demands nuanced debate. Addiction Research & Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2025.2509632
Abstract
First paragraph:
Morris et al. (Citation2024) respond to recent claims that societal disapproval may help reduce ¡®substance use and addiction¡¯ (SUA) (Vanyukov Citation2023a, Citation2023b) by approaching the issue as an empirical question: specifically, to what extent ¡®disapproval¡¯ in real-world settings risks manifesting as stigmatization. In response, Vanyukov and Kirisci (Citation2024) reject this cautionary position, arguing instead for disapproval toward SUA to become a normative ¡®consensus¡¯. They further suggest that over-extending the concept of stigma, such that it encompasses ¡®legitimate disapproval¡¯, risks suppressing reasonable perspectives. We agree that it is essential to examine the distinction between norms and stigmatization, which we discuss below. However, we believe the original question ¨C what does ¡®beneficial disapproval¡¯ look like in practice ¨C remains unanswered.
Journal
Addiction Research & Theory
| Status | Early Online |
|---|---|
| Publication date online | 31/05/2025 |
| Date accepted by journal | 19/05/2025 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited |
| ISSN | 1606-6359 |
| eISSN | 1476-7392 |
People (1)
Senior Lecturer in Public Health, Health Sciences Stirling